'the domination of the UN these days by anti-Americans, anti-Semites, and a raving lunatic Islamic bloc?'
We like to call it 'the rest of the world' Shabba. And as DBO says, the rest of the world hardly dominates. If they did, Israel would have been forced to adhere to all those resolutions it has ignored.
Occupier of land, denier of basic human rights, source of conflict, and agressor. And you say the Israelis are defending themselves? That's laughable.
Why mingle with semantics? If the refugees were given their right of return, if the Israeli military would end military activites against Arabs, and if Palestinians were given full rights, there would hardly be conflict. Not over "Israel proper" or anything.
5 Comments:
'the domination of the UN these days by anti-Americans, anti-Semites, and a raving lunatic Islamic bloc?'
We like to call it 'the rest of the world' Shabba. And as DBO says, the rest of the world hardly dominates. If they did, Israel would have been forced to adhere to all those resolutions it has ignored.
Glenn, I must agree with your sharp point. America and Israel have a sense that the UN is biased against them. What a joke!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Defend itself? It is the occupier!
Occupier of land, denier of basic human rights, source of conflict, and agressor. And you say the Israelis are defending themselves? That's laughable.
Why mingle with semantics? If the refugees were given their right of return, if the Israeli military would end military activites against Arabs, and if Palestinians were given full rights, there would hardly be conflict. Not over "Israel proper" or anything.
Post a Comment
<< Home