Yesh Gvul
Courage To Refuse
Shministim
Pilots
Free The Five
New Profile
Refuser Solidarity Network


Name: Antony Loewenstein
Home: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Comment Rules
About Me:
See my complete profile



Google
Web antonyloewenstein.blogspot.com
Sweat-Shop Productions
Sweat-Shop Productions
Sweat-Shop Productions



Blogs

Sites




Previous Posts



Powered by Blogger

 


Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Money buys lots of lollies

Who said that being a multimillionaire defence contractor doesn't make good business sense? David H. Brooks' daughter had her bat-mitzvah last weekend in the US, so naturally enough daddy wanted to show how much he cared - while ignoring the misery his job actually creates - and hired a plethora of A-list musicians to entertain the audience/kid's party.

A worthwhile lesson in how dirty money can be used for good...instead of evil.

19 Comments:

Blogger Pete said...

Oh Shab

Even body armour in Iraq is a weapon of war.

Just lets soldiers live to fight n kill more "A-rabs" another day.

(Ad time) However see my blog story on how Martin Luther King Jr fended off the FBI.

Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:47:00 pm  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

Of course, let's blame the racism on this site on its victims. AL the antisemite innocently brought up 'bat-matzvah', never realizing that it was something Jewish and that it might be interprited as a slam about Jews profiting off of war as a reason why they encourage nations to have wars.

Is that smith hanging out of AL's ass or is just an optical illusion?

Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:56:00 pm  
Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

I had no idea a bat-mitzvah was Jewish? I had a bloody bar-mitzvah myself in the good old days...
As I say, making money by military means is morally wrong. Of course, some little capitalists are proud of anyone who makes a buck, no matter the means.

Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:09:00 am  
Blogger Unknown said...

All Australian military personnel are immoral?

Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:27:00 am  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

To some, making money by any means is exploitive. That you object to some making money off manufacturing body armer is a reasonable objection.

Your interjection that the money was used for a party celebrating a religious event is a little off topic. To suggest it was jewish is antisemitc.

Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:22:00 am  
Blogger Pete said...

jf

I'm sure Manuel in Fawlty Towers would have queried "keh?" to your quixotic question.

uphillsprinter

Re "A-rab" - yes its the hard "A" many Americans use (particularly from the South).

smiths

Sometimes the anti-blog dissenters to which you refer are sound intellectual sparring partners and this should be appreciated.

Though I wonder whether Shaboo has dedicated his existence to keeping AL "honest". If so a noble, but, at times, tedious sacrific.

Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:31:00 am  
Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

Keeping me honest? Jeez, I think I'll be looking elsewhere for moral guidance. A man who celebrates hangings and advocates torture exudes such bravery...

Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:49:00 am  
Blogger Glenn Condell said...

'Your interjection that the money was used for a party celebrating a religious event is a little off topic.'

Horseshit as usual. The thing is, a man who has made shitloads of cash from a business profiting from the deaths of innocent people in an illegal war, decides he'll spend ten million of it on his daughter's party. That is a disgrace.

'To suggest it was jewish is antisemitc.'

Err, it was a Jewish celebration wasn't it? Isn't bat-mitzvah a Jewish ritual? AL didn't 'suggest' it, the report did, and it's not a 'suggestion' it's a plain fact that needs no 'suggestion'. How do you live in such a paranoiac fug? Do you feel the ethnicity of the principals should have been suppressed? You're all for freedom of the press except when it reveals facts that don't comport with your ugly world view.

Had the daughter's party been a whitebread Christian birthday celebration, it still would have been news. Still, it's not a good look is it, to have US Jews flaunting wealth generated via the misery of their ancient enemies.

Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:31:00 pm  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

Smith, AL was deliberately linking a rite of passage in the Jewish religion with profiteering on war.

But you're still hanging out of his ass, aren't you? Like being a shill? Does it pay well?

Seems AL is still pissed at the accident of his birth.

Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:11:00 pm  
Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

Actually, I wasn't, but why let facts get in the way of a good yarn?
I would have linked to the story if the family were Christian, Muslim, whatever. The point was simply about a man profiteering from war. His religion was secondary, at best.

Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:42:00 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

AL wrote:

As I say, making money by military means is morally wrong.

So, you deem all Australian military personnel to be immoral, right?

Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:39:00 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

There endeth the lesson on evasion. We shouldn't have to assume anything: Mr Loewenstein should clarify.

It is Australia's military personnel – all of whom are volunteers – who employ the instruments of death.

For the third time AL, are Australia's military personnel immoral or not?

Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:12:00 pm  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

Eddie gave a lesson in ethics? That's a laugh. But now we have an insight on his lack of educational credentials.

Friday, December 02, 2005 12:14:00 am  
Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

Making money from war is immoral, as the sweet David H. Brooks can testify. I have never said all soldiers are immoral, or anything of the sort.
As usual, please don't let the facts get in the way, you brave truth tellers!
And tell me, how is that liberation coming along?

Friday, December 02, 2005 9:13:00 am  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

To most ultra-liberals, making money by anything but your own sweat is immoral.

Friday, December 02, 2005 12:49:00 pm  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

No confusion. His point was to highlight a Jew he considered immoral. We all got his point.

Friday, December 02, 2005 9:54:00 pm  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

If AL answered honestly without all the layers of his screwed up life, I would perfer his answer too.

Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:51:00 am  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

Most sites degenerate when you start throwing in subtle antisemitic reasoning for the troubles in any particular region.

The same reason why any site degenerates when ever hints of racism is used to explain things.

Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:56:00 am  
Blogger Robert Wendt, Jr. said...

Wow - what a thread. If Arabs are Semites, isn't it anti-Semitic to kill 100,000 of them in an illegal immoral war based on lies and "fixed" intelligence?" How about digging up Muslim graves in a 1,000-year-old Jerusalem cemetary to make room for a Museum of "Tolerance" underwritten by the Simon Wiesenthal Center? If those actions are not anti-Semitic, nothing is.

Friday, February 10, 2006 6:37:00 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home