Yesh Gvul
Courage To Refuse
Shministim
Pilots
Free The Five
New Profile
Refuser Solidarity Network


Name: Antony Loewenstein
Home: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Comment Rules
About Me:
See my complete profile



Google
Web antonyloewenstein.blogspot.com
Sweat-Shop Productions
Sweat-Shop Productions
Sweat-Shop Productions



Blogs

Sites




Previous Posts



Powered by Blogger

 


Wednesday, December 14, 2005

1000 days

1000 days after invasion, some facts on the Iraq war:

$204.4 billion The cost to the US of the war so far. The UK's bill up until March 2005 was £3.1 billion
2,339 Allied troops killed
98 UK troops killed
30,000 Estimated Iraqi civilian deaths
0 Number of WMDs found
8 per cent of Iraqi children suffering acute malnutrition
$35,819m World Bank estimated cost of reconstruction
53,470 Iraqi insurgents killed
67 per cent Iraqis who feel less secure because of occupation
$343 Average monthly salary for an Iraqi soldier. Average monthly salary for an American soldier in Iraq: $4,160.75
66 journalists killed in Iraq. Journalists killed during Vietnam war: 63
5 foreign civilians kidnapped per month
47 per cent Iraqis who never have enough electricity
20 casualties per month from unexploded mines
20 per cent Inflation rate 2005
25-40 per cent Estimated unemployment rate, Nov 2005
251 Foreigners kidnapped
70 per cent of Iraqi's whose sewage system rarely works
183,000 British and American troops are still in action in Iraq. There are 162,000 US troops and 8,000 British with 13,000 from other nations
90 Daily attacks by insurgents in Nov '05. In Jun '03: 8
82 per cent Iraqis who are "strongly opposed" to presence of coalition troops
15,955 US troops wounded in action

4 Comments:

Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

I agree. Many of the numbers cited seem very low, especially Iraqi casualties. The true cost of this war insane war is way higher, if that's at all possible.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:58:00 am  
Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

I was simply quoting the Independent figures, published yesterday. The Lancet report could be correct, Fisk suggests as high as 150-200k. We simply don't know. I suspect the Indy was following Bush's lead the previous day. Odd, perhaps.
My own reading suggests the Lancet is probably a very conservative figure.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:06:00 am  
Blogger Pete said...

I don't think even Bush could justify the benefits to the US economy (and services to the Texas oil industry) based on these figures.

His Republican business backers just gotta learn that war (not to mention mass death) is ultimately bad for business.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:19:00 pm  
Blogger Antony Loewenstein said...

What is it with people who think occupation is the only way to bring stability? Nonsense, of course.
Another survey in Iraq is a mixed bag (http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,389946,00.html
but certainly the view of the occupation remains dim, very dim.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:18:00 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home