Yesh Gvul
Courage To Refuse
Free The Five
New Profile
Refuser Solidarity Network

Name: Antony Loewenstein
Home: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Comment Rules
About Me:
See my complete profile

Sweat-Shop Productions
Sweat-Shop Productions
Sweat-Shop Productions



Previous Posts

Powered by Blogger


Thursday, February 09, 2006

Jobs for the mates

The Bush administration likes to tackle terrorism in its own special way:

"State Department officials appointed by President Bush have sidelined key career weapons experts and replaced them with less experienced political operatives who share the White House and Pentagon's distrust of international negotiations and treaties.

"The reorganization of the department's arms control and international security bureaus was intended to help it better deal with 21st-century threats. Instead, it's thrown the agency into turmoil and produced an exodus of experts with decades of experience in nuclear arms, chemical weapons and related matters, according to 11 current and former officials and documents obtained by Knight Ridder.

"The reorganization was conducted largely in secret by a panel of four political appointees. A career expert was allowed to join the group only after most decisions had been made. Its work was overseen by Frederick Fleitz, a CIA officer who was detailed to the State Department as senior adviser to former Undersecretary of State John Bolton, a critic of arms agreements and international organizations."

Take this one example:

"Thomas Lehrman, a political appointee who heads the new office of Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism, advertised outside the State Department to fill jobs in his office. In an e-mail to universities and research centres, a copy of which was obtained by Knight Ridder, he listed loyalty to Bush and Rice's priorities as a qualification.

"Lehrman reportedly recalled the e-mail after it was pointed out that such loyalty tests are improper."

Lehrman would have fitted right into the "Evil Empire."


Blogger Wombat said...

What more evidence does one need that the US is going to attack Iran, whatever the reason. Clearly, evidence and expert opinion is not being sought.

This is essentially what happened in the lead up to the Iraq war, and yet, the conclusion was that the WMD fubar was the product of faulty intelligence.

How rediculous.

Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:40:00 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home