Britain's Sunday Telegraph publishes an interesting report:
"Millions of Iraqis believe that suicide attacks against British troops are justified, a secret military poll commissioned by senior officers has revealed.
"The poll, undertaken for the Ministry of Defence and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, shows that up to 65 per cent of Iraqi citizens support attacks and fewer than one per cent think Allied military involvement is helping to improve security in their country.
"It demonstrates for the first time the true strength of anti-Western feeling in Iraq after more than two and a half years of bloody occupation."
Citizens of any country don't want to be occupied. This is not hard to understand. Momentum for a withdrawal of "Coalition" troops is building.
The ideal position would be a withdrawal in disgrace, tail between the legs and severely scarred, unlikely to contemplate anything of the sort again.
Sometimes lessons need to be taught the hard way.
The Australian media is reluctant to call for a withdrawal, not unlike the Labor party, fearful of being seen as weak on terror. Real bravery requires understanding when a monumental blunder has been made.
Ideology has opened the floodgates:
"US intelligence officials say Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has expanded his terrorism campaign in Iraq to extremists in two dozen terrorist groups in about 40 countries, creating a network that rivals Osama bin Laden's.
"Millions of Iraqis believe that suicide attacks against British troops are justified, a secret military poll commissioned by senior officers has revealed.
"The poll, undertaken for the Ministry of Defence and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, shows that up to 65 per cent of Iraqi citizens support attacks and fewer than one per cent think Allied military involvement is helping to improve security in their country.
"It demonstrates for the first time the true strength of anti-Western feeling in Iraq after more than two and a half years of bloody occupation."
Citizens of any country don't want to be occupied. This is not hard to understand. Momentum for a withdrawal of "Coalition" troops is building.
The ideal position would be a withdrawal in disgrace, tail between the legs and severely scarred, unlikely to contemplate anything of the sort again.
Sometimes lessons need to be taught the hard way.
The Australian media is reluctant to call for a withdrawal, not unlike the Labor party, fearful of being seen as weak on terror. Real bravery requires understanding when a monumental blunder has been made.
Ideology has opened the floodgates:
"US intelligence officials say Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has expanded his terrorism campaign in Iraq to extremists in two dozen terrorist groups in about 40 countries, creating a network that rivals Osama bin Laden's.
"US government officials said the threat to US interests from Zarqawi compared with that from bin Laden, to whom Zarqawi pledged his loyalty a year ago."
3 Comments:
Isn't the 'logic' great?
If only the US had fought the battle better, smarter etc and the media had been simply cheerleaders, 'we' would have won in Vietnam. The fact that it was an immoral, illegal and hideous war is beside the point.
Likewise in Iraq.
Such are the believers in the wonders of spreading Western freedom and democracy.
paul
Following violent combat - sounds like you might be suffering post traumatic stress disorder.
I suggest that passionately fighting bloggers on the web is not the best answer.
Their are two few able recruits in the army (I know I've been there).
I suggest you go back there or perhaps get help.
Well Paul
Your sure adding to the diversity of views on this blog.
And that can't be a bad thing.
I'm a thought refugee from The Road to Surfdom, where they're truly intolerant of anti-blog views.
Even if I don't agree with your preconceptions, analysis or conclusions, keep writing. Often opposing ideas can reach some synthesis over time.
Pete
Post a Comment
<< Home